Skip to content
The Journal
Editorial · 2026

The probate fee that wasn't — a short history of the £6,000 idea

Why the probate registry has been the most contested fee in the civil service.

Standard Index Group1 March 20265 min read526 words

In 2017, and again in 2019, the government proposed that the fee for applying for a grant of probate should be banded against the value of the estate. At the top end, the fee would have been £6,000 — a number, the Ministry of Justice was at pains to point out, that nonetheless represented less than half a per cent of the estates concerned.

Both proposals were withdrawn. The argument that defeated them was not that the fee was too high in absolute terms.

It was that a fee for a service is meant to recover the cost of providing that service, and that a charge scaled to the value of the estate rather than to the cost of the work is a tax wearing a fee's clothes. The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments doubted the charges were fees at all within the powers being relied on, and the Ministry did not carry the point.

What replaced the proposal

In May 2024, a far more modest reform took effect. The single-tier fee rose from £273 to £300 for all estates above £5,000. Estates below £5,000 pay nothing. The reform was justified on cost-recovery grounds and passed without controversy. The political appetite for treating the probate registry as a revenue stream had visibly departed.

That £300 has since gone too. The Court and Tribunal Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2026 raised the application fee to £526 with effect from 13 July 2026 — a rise of 75%, still flat-rate, still indifferent to whether the estate is worth £6,000 or £6 million. The banding argument has not been reopened.

It is worth keeping the history in mind when reading current coverage of probate costs. The court fee is a small fraction of the bill for any non-trivial estate. The argument about whether it should be larger has been had twice, in living memory, and resolved against the larger number.

The fee that arrived instead

What changed in November 2025 was less visible and more consequential. The Court and Public Guardian Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2025 raised the fee for a copy of a probate document naming a specific individual from £1.50 to £16.00 — a rise of more than ten times, and not an inflation uplift. The Ministry of Justice justified it as cost recovery, on HMCTS's own estimate that a single copy costs £16 to provide.

An estate with twelve banks and brokers, each requiring its own sealed copy, saw that line of the disbursement bill go from £18 to £192 overnight.

Whether a copy fee set at the registry's own estimate of its cost raises the same objection is a narrower question than the one that defeated the £6,000 idea, and a much less interesting one. Cost recovery was the principle the Joint Committee applied. This time the Ministry brought a cost figure to it.

The £16 has since been split rather than withdrawn. From 13 July 2026 a copy requested with the grant application costs £2.00, and a copy requested after the grant has issued still costs £16.00. The twelve-institution estate above now pays £24 if it orders in time and £192 if it does not.

● Last reviewed ·
Editorial register · Standard Index Group ·
Published by Standard Index Group
Updated Mar 2026
● Related tools & reading
From reading to ready

This guide is free, and it stays free. The Household Continuity Dossier renders your household's own version — your people, your accounts, your wishes — into a maintained record your executor or trusted person will actually reach for, kept current every year.

See The Household Continuity Dossier

Most people never need more than a guide like this one. If the situation behind it has stopped being simple — a trust, inheritance tax, foreign assets, a business, a dispute in view — Signum, Valoren’s own specialist desk, can take it on, and we say so plainly: it starts with a free intake, and if you do not need us, we will tell you. Prefer an independent adviser? STEP and the Chartered Institute of Taxation both keep public member directories — neither pays Valoren a referral fee.

Keep this piece

Have this piece in your inbox.

Leave your email and we'll send a link to this essay, plus a few short follow-up notes over the next few weeks. You can unsubscribe with one click in any of them.

Reply with any question and a person reads it.

Valoren is a trading name of Standard Index Group — in formation.
We never sell your data. We never spam. The unsubscribe link is in every email.

Free guides from the library
Browse all guides
The Journal · Monthly

One essay a month.
Substance, not noise.

One long-form essay, one statute-update brief, one anonymised case-study. From advisors@valoren.uk. Never shared. Never sold. One-click unsubscribe.

Part of a working library79form walkthroughs90+free guidesevery calculator & checker